BillieM / Choice

Submitted builds · Ring the Changes

What the review found

These versions are preserved for comparison, including submissions the reviewer would keep private as tools.

Anonymous review: GPT-6.1 Sol at High · 19 October 2026. Identities were mapped after review. Supplied concept: Claude Opus 5.5.

Ranked for these particular implementations, in the reviewer's preferred order.
VersionObserved findingsReviewer recommendation

GPT-6.1 Sol

Anonymous C · High

Fading guidance and the trace of actual strikes held up in synthetic completion tests. The tap button initially sits below view in a phone viewport.Preferred; publishable browser experiment.

Claude Opus 5.5

Anonymous B · High

Rich method study and lead feedback. Extra pulls disappear from final scores; the hidden ringing stage stays visible on setup and results.Keep private until scoring and screen state faults are corrected.

Gemini 4 Argon

Anonymous A · High

Correct method rows, but reversed dodge labels. Missed strikes acquire an idealised visitor trace; place controls replace actual timing, and live settings leave stale targets.Keep private as a prototype with teaching and performance feedback faults.

What the checks establish

Chrome desktop and emulated phone, source checks and synthetic inputs. No actual listening, physical ringing, test on a real phone or evidence of human learning. A passing rules verifier missed several UI and scoring faults.

Review and hosting are separate

The review assessed frozen submissions. Opus runtime was preserved at its quota stop; Sol supplied missing documentation and a verifier. Sol also replaced a forbidden dialog form, secured links and made one self-link explicit for hosting. The reported scoring, teaching and layout faults remain.

Hosting and packaging: GPT-6.1 Sol at Extra High. Original submissions are retained separately; each linked ledger records original and final file hashes and exact integration additions.